James Pritchett: Writings on Cage (& others)


'Entering a living world'
(work in progress)

[Notes for a colloquium]

This text copyright 1994 by James Pritchett. All rights reserved. Not to be copied or redistributed without permission.


. . . New ideas suggest themselves, need defining, exploring, need a mind that knows it is entering a living world, not a dead one. When you set out for a living world you don't know what to take with you because you don't know where you're going. You don't know if the temperature will be warm or cold; you have to buy your clothes when you get there.

-- Morton Feldman, 'Conversations without Stravinsky' (1967)


I

1

I never know what I'm doing now. When I mention a project, I always say 'I don't have any idea what I'll say, but I'll think of something.'

2

In my work, all my energies are directed towards keeping the experience of the music alive and somehow mysterious. How do I do it? I don't know; I don't think about where I'm going, I just go (Feldman again). Huang Po's advice: From morning till night, do not rely on any single thing.

3

I was asked what books had influenced me; like most questions from musicologists, it zoomed right past me. Cage first (a conversation); then nature writing--sitting and waiting, going to the same place every day. My method (if any): just go out there and hang out. Like reading the books John did. Live.

4

Poetry.

Read Frank O'Hara, Standing still and walking in New York, p. 112.

This goes very well with my line of thinking these days.


II-a

1

Wanting to write about Feldman, but baffled. Left with a peculiar look on my face, hands empty, the music long gone. Grasping at straws, I settled on a piano piece.

Play Piano piece (1964).
2

The feel of the piece under my fingers. The sounds just brush the silence, barely touching. This suggests an analogy with drawing, brush-and-ink, brushstrokes. I became fascinated with the different types of stroke he uses. Responding to the different kinds of line.

3

Look at the opening lines:

  • Grace note going to a measured silence. Most of the piece is grace notes: lift, all up and no down.
  • Open head versus closed head -- touch versus a dab? Difference between grace note before bar line and after (slight weight).
  • Fermata? Breath.
  • Metered bar: Not trailing, glancing, brushing, but put down and then lifted up, deliberately.
  • Decays, trailing off, running out of ink.
  • The 'thickened attack'.
4

Where is the tactile dimension? You can't point to it -- it's not a parameter (as it is in, say, Boulez). Holistic: can't just apply touch to the finished product. Unlike Boulez, Feldman's in there, doing it.

5

Touch: Mondrian story (spray-painted picture didn't even look like a Mondrian). 'For me, at least, this seems to be the answer, even if it is nothing more than the ephemeral feel of the pencil in my hand when I work. I'm sure if I dictated my music, even if I dictated it exactly, it would never be the same.' ('Anxiety of art', 1969)


II-b

1

Trying to get a handle on the pitch/harmonic element. Grays, non-pitched clusters. Began thinking in terms of graph piece notations.

2

History lesson: graph pieces. Feldman didn't turn back on them, but continued to write them until 1969.

3

Found the graph transcription wanting: had to make exceptions, alterations; couldn't get the rhythm notated; lost the touch. Lost shades of gray, places where pitchiness should intrude. Feldman's on-again, off-again use of graph notation for same reasons? Precise non-pitchiness: 'play three notes that I like.'

4
Play Piano piece (1964) again.

II-c

1

Once, after playing the piece, it made me think of For Frank O'Hara (1973).

Play For Frank O'Hara.
2

Nothing to add, really; it speaks for itself. A path I'll follow next.

James Pritchett
Princeton, 15 November 1994